<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Amendment: Still in force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegoodcity.com/2008/06/26/second-amendment-still-in-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegoodcity.com/2008/06/26/second-amendment-still-in-force/</link>
	<description>city, culture and church · Fort Wayne, Indiana</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lyn</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodcity.com/2008/06/26/second-amendment-still-in-force/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodcity.wordpress.com/?p=237#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m shocked, SHOCKED that the S.C. actually took this case on. Doubly shocked that they actually recognized (by a razor-thin margin) the right embodied in the 2nd A -- and by implication -- and the privileges granted to government in the Constitution.

The ENTIRE BILL OF RIGHTS is all about the unalienable rights of the individual... NOT any state-sponsored &quot;militia&quot;.

I can be argued that none of this applies to DC because DC  is not a state... it is a federal zone and this is a different legal entity with a different set of rules. Of course, nobody wants to admit this by making the argument because it&#039;s politically very inexpedient to do so. Therefore, the ppl in DC will probably get their guns and their vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked, SHOCKED that the S.C. actually took this case on. Doubly shocked that they actually recognized (by a razor-thin margin) the right embodied in the 2nd A &#8212; and by implication &#8212; and the privileges granted to government in the Constitution.</p>
<p>The ENTIRE BILL OF RIGHTS is all about the unalienable rights of the individual&#8230; NOT any state-sponsored &#8220;militia&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can be argued that none of this applies to DC because DC  is not a state&#8230; it is a federal zone and this is a different legal entity with a different set of rules. Of course, nobody wants to admit this by making the argument because it&#8217;s politically very inexpedient to do so. Therefore, the ppl in DC will probably get their guns and their vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
