Comments on: Traditional neighborhoods and modern architecture

By: jerremy scots

jerremy scots — Thu, 15 May 2008 04:02:04 +0000

but if you follow the neighborhood architecture and not be allowed to create “new” homes, how will you define 21st century architecture?

By: Fitness is about symmetry « Emergent Urbanism

Fitness is about symmetry « Emergent Urbanism — Fri, 02 May 2008 20:09:35 +0000

[...] could be made to fit with the museum and South Kensington in general. To support this they link to this Good City post on traditional neighborhoods and modern architecture, which argues that the only thing necessary [...]

By: Michael Bates

Michael Bates — Thu, 01 May 2008 03:33:03 +0000

So this is really more of a conservation district, where the focus is consistency of building plan, than a historic preservation district, where the focus is on consistency of exterior appearance and detail.

By: john b. kalb

john b. kalb — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:43:55 +0000

Jon and Scott – The photo could be a “future shot” of the southern end buildings on the Broadway block – with some work. It sure would fit in.

By: David Sucher

David Sucher — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:16:04 +0000

Bravo!