Comments on: New Urbanism blooms in Bloomington http://www.thegoodcity.com/2008/01/new-urbanism-blooms-in-bloomington/ city, culture and church ยท Fort Wayne, Indiana Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:50:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Must New Urbanism look old? « the good city http://www.thegoodcity.com/2008/01/new-urbanism-blooms-in-bloomington/comment-page-1/#comment-158 Must New Urbanism look old? « the good city Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:06:27 +0000 http://thegoodcity.wordpress.com/2008/01/17/new-urbanism-blooms-in-bloomington/#comment-158 [...] 22, 2008 (Jon) Neal makes a valid point regarding my post, “New Urbanism blooming in Bloomington”: A neat development in a neat town, but the main problem is that the new houses are old-fashioned [...] [...] 22, 2008 (Jon) Neal makes a valid point regarding my post, “New Urbanism blooming in Bloomington”: A neat development in a neat town, but the main problem is that the new houses are old-fashioned [...]

]]> By: Evan http://www.thegoodcity.com/2008/01/new-urbanism-blooms-in-bloomington/comment-page-1/#comment-157 Evan Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:01:45 +0000 http://thegoodcity.wordpress.com/2008/01/17/new-urbanism-blooms-in-bloomington/#comment-157 A neat development in a neat town, but the main problem is that the new houses are old-fashioned looking. What part of "New Urbanism" says it has to look like the thirties? I know the looks are a response to what suburban building looks like currently, but there is another direction you can take this in - new designs. I would be a lot more attracted to something more fresh looking. A neat development in a neat town, but the main problem is that the new houses are old-fashioned looking. What part of “New Urbanism” says it has to look like the thirties?

I know the looks are a response to what suburban building looks like currently, but there is another direction you can take this in – new designs. I would be a lot more attracted to something more fresh looking.

]]>